Citation

Stern P. Arch. Sex. Behav. 2010; 39(6): 1443-1447.

Affiliation

Snohomish County Prosecutors Office, 3000 Rockefeller Avenue, M/S 504, Everett, WA, 98201, USA, pstern@co.snohomish.wa.us.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s10508-010-9645-9

PMID

20567890

Abstract

The recommendation to include a Paraphilic Coercive Disorder (PCD) diagnosis in the DSM-5 represents an improvement over current options and would lead to the shrinking of the pool of individuals considered for detention as Sexually Violent Predators. A precise description of the diagnostic criteria for PCD would permit psychologists and psychiatrists to use more specific and narrow criteria for those who seek sexual gratification by coercing others to engage in unwanted sexual behavior. This might permit mental health professionals to abandon the Paraphilia NOS designation in favor of the more defined PCD in appropriate cases. Various critics have attacked the proposal on what appears to be misplaced ideological grounds. Not only should ideological concerns not play a part in a scientific debate, but the critics' predictions of how the PCD diagnosis would play out in the legal arena are likely wrong. Paraphilic Coercive Disorder would give the judicial system the best opportunity to most accurately identify the small group of men who have previously committed, and are likely in the future to commit, this type of predatory sexual violence.

Language: en