SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jenkins JC, Gallimore JJ. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 2008; 79(4): 397-407.

Affiliation

Department of Biomedical, Industrial, and Human Factors Engineering, 207 Russ Engineering Center, 3640 Colonel Glenn Highway, Dayton, OH 45435, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2008, Aerospace Medical Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

18457297

Abstract

BACKGROUND: In the current research, we used configural displays to investigate what design features contribute to the formation of operator situation awareness (SA). Configural displays have been shown to provide better performance for integration tasks, yet the design aspects of these displays which affect the formation of operator SA have not been determined. OBJECTIVE: We compared the design features of three configural attitude head-up displays (HUD) [joint strike fighter (JSF), dual articulated (DA), and arc segment attitude reference (ASAR)] presented on a helmet mounted display (HMD) across four experiments to quantify what aspects of configural displays would affect pilot SA. METHODS: In Experiment 1, nine expert pilots completed recall tasks for briefly-presented aircraft attitude displays to measure Level 1 SA performance. In Experiments 2-4, 10 highly trained pilots (expert group) and 10 flight test engineers (novice group) served as subjects to investigate higher level SA performance in an unusual attitude recovery (UAR) task. Experiments 3 and 4 included off-axis attitude symbology UARs. RESULTS: Experiment 1 results indicated a higher percentage of correct responses for recognition of climb and dive states with the ASAR configural display. Results from Experiments 2-4 indicated no differences in performance. Results also showed that transitioning between dissimilar configural displays conveying attitude does not affect pilot SA. CONCLUSIONS: This research discusses the specific properties of aviation configural displays. The results suggest that using these displays with the full range of aircraft states is sufficient for SA to be established when rapidly transitioning between dissimilar configural displays. Results indicate that differences in performance are diminished when using experts and significant training may overcome differences that exist among the configural displays.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print