Citation

Ratcliff JJ, Lassiter GD, Schmidt HC, Snyder CJ. J. Exp. Psychol. Appl. 2006; 12(4): 197-206.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Ohio University, Athens, OH 45701, USA. ratcliffjen@frognet.net

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/1076-898X.12.4.197

PMID

17154769

Abstract

The camera perspective from which a criminal confession is videotaped influences later assessments of its voluntariness and the suspect's guilt. Previous research has suggested that this camera perspective bias is rooted in perceptual rather than conceptual processes, but these data are strictly correlational. In 3 experiments, the authors directly manipulated perceptual processing to provide stronger evidence of its mediational role. Prior to viewing a videotape of a simulated confession, participants were shown a photograph of the confessor's apparent victim. Participants in a perceptual interference condition were instructed to visualize the image of the victim in their minds while viewing the videotape; participants in a conceptual interference condition were instructed instead to rehearse an 8-digit number. Because mental imagery and actual perception draw on the same available resources, the authors anticipated that the former, but not the latter, interference task would disrupt the camera perspective bias, if indeed it were perceptually mediated. Results supported this conclusion.

Language: en