Citation

Kaltiala-Heino R, Fröjd S. Int. J. Law Psychiatry 2007; 30(1): 81-94.

Affiliation

Psychiatric Treatment and Research Unit for Adolescent Intensive Care (EVA), Tampere University Hospital Pitkäniemi, 33380 Pitkäniemi, Finland. Riittakerttu.Kaltiala-Heino@uta.fi

Copyright

(Copyright © 2007, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ijlp.2006.04.002

PMID

17150252

Abstract

Since 1991, commitment to involuntary psychiatric care has been allowed in Finland for minors in broader terms than for adults. While in adults mental illness has to be diagnosable before involuntary treatment can be imposed, minors can be committed to and detained in involuntary psychiatric treatment if they suffer from "severe mental disorders", and fulfil the further commitment criteria defined in the Mental Health Act. The first years of the new mental health legislation showed an increase in involuntary treatment of minors in Finland. Concerns were raised about the imprecise nature of the commitment criterion "severe mental illness". This study set out to find out whether Finnish child and adolescent psychiatrists are in agreement on how to define severe mental illness and whether their interpretations are sufficiently similar to ensure the equality of minors in commitment to psychiatric care as prescribed by the Mental Health Act. Semi-structured, reflexive dyadic interviews were carried out with 44 psychiatrists working with children and adolescents. The data was analysed using qualitative content analysis. There was general agreement about what constitutes a "severe mental disorder" justifying the involuntary psychiatric treatment of minors. The child and adolescent psychiatrists were of the opinion that involuntary treatment of minors should not be tied to specific diagnostic categories. Which disorders are severe enough to justify commitment should rather be considered through developmental and functional impairment and interactions between a minor and her/his environment.

Language: en