SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Richter M, Otte D, Jahanyar K, Blauth M. J. Trauma 2000; 48(5): 907-912.

Affiliation

Department of Traumatology, Hannover Medical School, Germany. Richter.Martinus@MH-Hannover.de

Copyright

(Copyright © 2000, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10823535

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The aim of our study was to analyze the injury mechanism of upper extremity fractures in car crashes, to create a basis for developing prophylactic devices. METHODS AND RESULTS: During 1985-1995, 3,260 restrained car drivers (1,228 front-seat passengers) were injured in 9,380 crashes involving cars. A total of 179 drivers (5.5%) (front-seat passengers: n = 53, 4.3%) sustained fractures of the arm. The hand (25%), wrist (23%), and forearm (23%) were affected most often, and the elbow (9%), upper arm (10%), and shoulder (10%) were seldom affected. No considerable differences of the injury mechanism were found comparing drivers with front-seat passengers. Fractures were mainly caused by head-on collisions (n = 119, 51%) or multiple collisions (n = 78, 34%). In 73% of the crashes (n = 166), delta-v exceeded 30 km/h (18.6 mph). A lower Delta-v resulted mainly in fractures affecting the shoulder and wrist. CONCLUSION: Because more than half of the upper extremity fractures resulted from a direct impact to the hand, arm, or both, modifications to improve the energy absorption by padding dashboard and inner door or by additional airbags are promising.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print