Citation

Schneider B, Bissett R. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1988; 14(3): 503-512.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of Toronto, Mississauga, Ontario, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1988, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2971776

Abstract

Subjects were required to judge ratios and differences of (a) line length for pairs of lines, (b) area for pairs of squares, and (c) volume for pairs of cubes. Nonmetric analyses of these judgments indicated that all subjects were able to make consistent ratio judgments for all three continua. Many of the subjects, when asked to judge subjective differences, however, performed as if they were judging subjective ratios rather than differences. The data for the few subjects who appeared to be judging subjective differences were not consistent across subjects and conditions. Previous studies of ratio and difference judgments of loudness and heaviness, on the other hand, showed the opposite pattern, in that subjects most often behaved as if they were judging sensory differences when asked to judge sensory ratios. We propose that ratio judgments are more natural to perceptual continua along which stimuli are easily "decomposed" into a number of smaller perceptual units.

Language: en