SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Harding RM, Bomar JB. Aviat. Space Environ. Med. 1990; 61(9): 845-849.

Affiliation

Crew Technology Division, USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Brooks Air Force Base, San Antonio, TX 78235.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1990, Aerospace Medical Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2241753

Abstract

That pressure breathing for G protection (PBG) can improve both tolerance and endurance to high sustained +Gz acceleration is now well established. It is not surprising, therefore, that the undoubted potential benefits of PBG in an operational environment have been greeted with enthusiasm by aircrew and their commanders. In some quarters, the use of positive pressure breathing (PPB) during periods of high sustained +Gz acceleration is being hailed as a potential cure for the problem of G-induced loss of consciousness (G-LOC). We believe, however, that confidence in the technique for this purpose in modern, highly agile fighter aircraft is misplaced. This article reviews PPB's background and present use as protection against +Gz acceleration, and summarizes the physiologic basis for its effectiveness, before relating it to its undoubted role in support of other anti-G strategies. From theoretical considerations supported by published evidence, we conclude that while PPB, if used correctly and when combined with other strategies, can enhance tolerance to +Gz acceleration, its principal influence on the occurrence of G-LOC will be by virtue of its ability to increase endurance by decreasing aircrew fatigue.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print