Citation

Briggs JE, Patel H, Butterfield K, Honeybourne D. Respir. Med. 1990; 84(1): 43-46.

Affiliation

Department of Thoracic Medicine, Dudley Road Hospital, Birmingham, U.K.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1990, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2371420

Abstract

Subjects with chronic obstructive airways disease may have difficulty with the roadside alcolmeter. Twenty-six subjects with a FEV1/FVC less than 60% were asked to use an alcolmeter simulator. Only ten were able to produce the necessary flow rate of 28 l min-1 for a minimum of 2.7 s, two could produce the same total volume (1.25 l) at 10 l min-1 for 7.5 s, five could only expel 10 l min-1 for 4.5 s, and nine were unable to trigger the alcolmeter at even these very low flow rates. Subjects with an FEV1 of less than 1.51 or FEV1% predicted less than 50% were very unlikely to be able to activate the alcolmeter. Ten healthy subjects were investigated to assess the accuracy of the roadside alcolmeter at a flow rate of 10 l min-1 compared to 40 l min-1. No significant difference was found in breath alcohol levels between the two flow rates. It is proposed that some modification could be made to the roadside alcolmeter, without affecting its accuracy, to allow some subjects with chronic obstructive lung disease to activate the device. A postal survey of 284 subjects with a FEV1/FVC less than 60% was carried out. Of those who were drivers or exdrivers, 24.7% had had to stop or reduce their driving because of their respiratory disease. This group had a significantly lower FEV1% predicted (P = 0.035) than those whose driving was unaffected.

Language: en