Citation

Pashler H. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 1991; 17(4): 1023-1040.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla 92093.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1991, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1837295

Abstract

Does shifting visual attention require the same central mechanism as that required for selecting overt motor responses? In Experiment 1, Ss performed 2 tasks: a speeded manual response to a tone and an unspeeded report of a cued target letter in a brief masked array. Stimulus onset asynchrony (SOA) between tone and array was varied. If the attention shift to the target was delayed by the first task, then there should be more second-task errors at short SOAs and on trials with slow first-task responses. In fact, SOA effects and dependencies were minimal. Results were unchanged in further experiments in which the relation between cue and target was symbolic, spatially "unnatural," or based on the color of the target. Two additional experiments validated key assumptions of the method. The results confirm that although selection of motor responses constitutes a processing bottleneck, the control of visual attention operates independently of this bottleneck.

Language: en