Citation

Krebs DL, Denton KL, Vermeulen SC, Carpendale JI, Bush A. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1991; 61(6): 1012-1023.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology, Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1991, American Psychological Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1774624

Abstract

One of the central assumptions of Kohlberg's theory of moral development--that moral judgment is organized in structures of the whole--was examined. Thirty men and 30 women were given 2 dilemmas from Kohlberg's Moral Judgment Interview, a 3rd involving prosocial behavior, and a 4th involving impaired driving. Half the Ss responded to the prosocial and impaired-driving dilemmas from the perspective of a hypothetical character, and half responded from the perspective of the self. No sex or perspective differences in moral maturity were observed. Ss scored highest in moral maturity on Kohlberg's dilemmas, intermediate on the prosocial dilemma, and lowest on the impaired-driving dilemma. In partial support of Kohlberg's contention that his test assesses moral competence, there was a negative linear relationship between scores on his test and the proportion of Stage 2 judgments on the 2 other dilemmas. An interactional model of moral judgment is advanced.

Language: en