Citation

Vos J. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 1992; 91(6): 3330-3345.

Affiliation

TNO Institute for Perception, Soesterberg, The Netherlands.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1992, American Institute of Physics)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

1619113

Abstract

In this study, total annoyance caused by different simultaneous environmental sounds is investigated. In spite of a number of puzzling data in the literature, it is fairly well established that in combinations in which the annoyance of one source is considerably higher than that of another source, total annoyance is equal to the maximum annoyance of the separate sources. For combinations in which both sounds are about equally annoying, total annoyance seems to be higher than the maximum source-specific annoyance. The available data, however, are too rough to model total annoyance in these conditions. The present laboratory studies were therefore designed to explore further possible procedures to quantify total annoyance. Subjects rated the (total) annoyance caused by various combinations of impulse, road-traffic, and aircraft sounds. The results support a simple model which predicts the overall or total rating sound level L(t) for combinations of several types of sounds. Here, L(t) is numerically equal to the A-weighted equivalent sound level L(eq) of road-traffic sound with the same annoyance as caused by the combination of sounds. In the model, the sound exposure caused by the impulse and/or aircraft sounds is first expressed in the L(eq) of equally annoying road-traffic sound. With the help of source-specific dose-effect relationships, this is achieved by adding level-dependent penalties to the L(eq) of the respective sources. Weighted summation of the corrected L(eq)'s of the various sources then results in L(t). An optimal overall fit of the data from two separate experiments was obtained when the weighted summation of the corrected L(eq)'s was performed with the parameter k in k log(sigma 10(corrected L(eq) of source j)/k) set to 15. The standard deviation of the differences between the experimental results and the model predictions with k = 15 was equivalent to the small change in annoyance produced by a 1.5-dB shift in the L(eq) of road-traffic sound. Adoption of k = 15 implies that after correction, two equal L(eq)'s yield a total rating sound level which is 4.5 dB higher than each single-source corrected L(eq).

Language: en