SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Bedell HE, Patel SS. Vision Res. 2005; 45(16): 2191-2200.

Affiliation

College of Optometry and Center for Neuro-engineering and Cognitive Science, 505 J. Davis Armistead, Bldg 713/743-2020, University of Houston, Houston TX 77204-2020, United States.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.visres.2005.01.032

PMID

15845249

Abstract

Previous studies indicated that less motion smear is perceived when a physically stationary target is presented during voluntary eye movements than when similar retinal-image motion occurs during steady fixation. In this study, we assessed whether the perception of motion smear is attenuated also during the involuntary vestibulo-ocular reflex (VOR). Normal observers matched the length of perceived smear in two experimental conditions that were designed to produce similar trajectories of retinal image motion. In the fixation condition, a small bright target was presented for a duration of 50-200ms in rightward or leftward motion, while the observer remained stationary and maintained fixation. In the VOR condition, the target moved along with the observer, who underwent full-body rotation around a vertical axis in darkness. Horizontal eye movement recordings during VOR trials allowed us to calculate the velocity of retinal image motion on each VOR trial. The principal result was that the extent of perceived motion smear was significantly less during VOR than fixation trials, particularly for target durations of 100ms or longer. These findings support the conclusion that extra-retinal signals during the involuntary VOR contribute to a reduction of perceived motion smear.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print