SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Szlyk JP, Seiple W, Stelmack J, McMahon T. Ophthalmic. Physiol. Opt. 2005; 25(2): 128-135.

Affiliation

Research and Development Service, VA Chicago Health Care System/West Side Division, Chicago, IL 60612, USA. janeszly@uic.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1475-1313.2004.00265.x

PMID

15713204

Abstract

PURPOSE: (1) To compare the outcomes of orientation and mobility and driving training with Fresnel prisms and the Gottlieb Visual Field Awareness System for patients with homonymous hemianopsia, and (2) To determine whether the patients continue to use the optical enhancement devices at a 2-year follow-up point. METHODS: Patients with homonymous hemianopsia were provided with a rehabilitation program where they were fitted with prism lenses and trained to use them for navigation and driving. Telephone interviews were used to obtain information about device usage 2 years following the completion of the training program. RESULTS: Patients' performance was compared with a test-retest criterion in the visual skills areas of recognition, mobility, peripheral detection, scanning, tracking, and visual memory. Patients with hemianopic loss showed improvements in all of the visual skills categories, ranging from the highest improvements of 26% of tasks improved in the mobility category to 13% in the recognition category. The majority of the hemianopic patients reported using the devices at the 2-year follow-up interview. CONCLUSIONS: The patients with homonymous hemianopsia showed improvements in visual functioning using prism lenses, although these improvements were smaller than those found in previous studies with central or bilateral peripheral vision loss groups who were trained to use other optical enhancement devices for navigation and driving using a similar curriculum. However, given the evidence of increased risk of accidents for patients with peripheral vision loss, the safety of peripheral enhancement devices for driving must be thoroughly evaluated before their impact on public safety is known.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print