SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Akinwuntan AE, De Weerdt W, Feys H, Baten G, Arno P, Kiekens C. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2005; 86(3): 421-426.

Affiliation

Department of Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Physical Education and Physiotherapy, Katholieke Universiteit Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Emmanuel.Akinwuntan@flok.kuleuven.ac.be

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.apmr.2004.04.047

PMID

15759222

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the validity of a road test performed by stroke patients in Belgium and to reestablish its reliability. DESIGN: Prospective study of a predriving evaluation. SETTING: University hospital in Belgium. PARTICIPANTS: Thirty-eight patients with sequelae of first-ever stroke. INTERVENTIONS: Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Performance in the Stroke Driver Screening Assessment (SDSA) and on a road test. RESULTS: Interrater reliability of the road test subitems was moderate to substantial (weighted kappa range, .44-.78). Item-per-item reliability varied from moderately high (intraclass correlation coefficient [ICC]=.63) to very high (ICC=.87). The reliability of the overall performance in the road test was very high (ICC=.83). For the criterion validity of the road test, 78.9% of the subjects were correctly classified when the judgments of the principal evaluator were compared with outcomes of the SDSA. Agreement in classification between the principal evaluator and a state-registered evaluator's judgments was 81.6%. The sensitivity and specificity of the agreement were very high (80.6%) and perfect (100%), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The road test is a reliable and valid test of driving ability after stroke.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print