SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Skeem JL, Mulvey EP, Odgers C, Schubert C, Stowman S, Gardner W, Lidz C. J. Consult. Clin. Psychol. 2005; 73(4): 599-609.

Affiliation

Department of Psychology and Social Behavior, University of California, Irvine, CA, US. skeem@uci.edu.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/0022-006X.73.4.599

PMID

16173847

Abstract

Mental health professionals' (MHPs') accuracy in assessing the risk of violence in female patients is particularly limited. Based on assessments made by 205 MHPs of 605 patients in an emergency room, this study explored potential causes of MHPs' poorer accuracy in assessing women's potential for violence. The dimensions that underlie MHPs' envisioned violence in patients were identified and were compared with those that characterized patients' reported violence during a 6-month follow-up period. There were three key findings from their study. First, violence envisioned by MHPs differed depending on their professional role and varied in its congruence with patients' reported violence. Second, patients' violence was organized by dimensions of domesticity and substance relatedness; women's violent incidents were more domestic than were men's. Third, when MHPs envisioned violence that was highly conditional on psychiatric deterioration and medication noncompliance, violence often did not occur.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print