SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Shechtman O, Awadzi KD, Classen S, Lanford DN, Joo Y. Am. J. Occup. Ther. 2010; 64(2): 242-251.

Affiliation

Department of Occupational Therapy, College of Public Health and Health Professions, Institute for Mobility, Activity and Participation, National Older Driver Research and Training Center, University of Florida, PO Box 100164, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL 32610, USA. oshechtm@phhp.ufl.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, American Occupational Therapy Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

20437911

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: We examined the validity of our on-road driving assessment to quantify its outcomes. METHOD: Older drivers (N = 127) completed a driving assessment on a standardized road course. Measurements included demographics, driving errors, and driving test outcomes; a categorical global rating score (pass-fail); and the sum of maneuvers (SMS) score (0-273). RESULTS: There were significant differences in the SMS (F = 29.9, df = 1, p < or = .001) between drivers who passed the driving test and those who failed. The SMS cutoff value of 230 points was established as the criterion because it yielded the most optimal combination of sensitivity (0.91) and specificity (0.87). The strongest predictors of failure were adjustment to stimuli and lane maintenance errors. CONCLUSION: The SMS differentiated between passing and failing drivers and can be used to inform clinical decision making.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print