SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Szlyk JP, Pizzimenti CE, Fishman GA, Kelsch R, Wetzel LC, Kagan S, Ho K. Arch. Ophthalmol. (1960) 1995; 113(8): 1033-1040.

Affiliation

Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Illinois, Chicago Eye Center, USA.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1995, American Medical Association)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

7639654

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the effects of age and central vision loss on driving skills. METHODS: Ten subjects with age-related macular degeneration and average binocular visual acuity of 20/70, and 11 age-similar subjects with normal vision, were examined with a battery of cognitive and visual tests, an interactive driving simulator, and an on-road driving test. Data were collected on the frequency of real-world accidents and convictions for traffic violations. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups on any of the cognitive tests. The age-related macular degeneration group demonstrated poorer performance on the driving simulator, including delayed braking response times to stop signs, slower speeds, and more of both lane boundary crossings and simulator accidents. The age-related macular degeneration group also demonstrated poorer overall on-road test performance, including having significantly more points deducted for driving too slowly and for not maintaining proper lane position. However, these effects on the simulator and the on-road test did not translate into an increased risk of real-world accidents for the age-related macular degeneration group. Significantly more control subjects than patients with age-related macular degeneration were involved in self-reported accidents, and significantly more control subjects had state convictions for traffic violations. There was evidence of compensation in the age-related macular degeneration group in four major areas: (1) not driving in unfamiliar areas; (2) traveling at slow speeds; (3) self-restricting their nighttime driving, and (4) taking fewer risks while driving (eg, not changing lanes). There was also evidence of compensation in the older control group. CONCLUSIONS: Vision, simulator, and on-road test variables combined with subjective risk taking predicted self-reported real-world accidents in a logistic regression analysis. However, risk taking, rather than simulator or road-test performance, was the most significant predictor for both patients with age-related macular degeneration and the control group.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print