Citation

Brooks JO, Tyrrell RA, Frank TA. Optom. Vis. Sci. 2005; 82(8): 689-697.

Affiliation

Psychology Department, Clemson University, Clemson, South Carolina 29634-1355, USA. jobrook@clemson.edu

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Lippincott Williams and Wilkins)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

16127334

Abstract

PURPOSE: Two experiments explored the extent to which induced blur, reduced luminance, and reduced visual fields affect drivers' steering performance in a driving simulator. METHODS: In experiment 1, ten young participants (M = 21.2 years) drove at approximately 89 km/h (55 mph) along a curvy roadway while being exposed to blur (0 to + 10 D), luminance (0.003 to 16.7 cd/m), and visual field (1.7 and 150 degrees) manipulations. In experiment 2, a new group of ten young participants (M = 18.5 years) drove while exposed to seven visual field sizes (1.7 to 150 degrees). RESULTS: Steering was sensitive to a reduced field size but not to the blur and luminance challenges. Acuity, on the other hand, was sensitive to the blur and luminance challenges but not to reduced field size. DISCUSSION: In healthy young drivers, steering performance is remarkably robust to severe blur and to extremely low luminances. These results support a key element of the selective degradation hypothesis advanced by Leibowitz and colleagues--that steering abilities are preserved at night even when the ability to recognize objects and hazards is not. Additional research should address the other element of this hypothesis--that drivers fail to appreciate the extent to which their visual abilities are degraded at night.