SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 300 new articles every week.
Email Signup | RSS Feed

Keep SafetyLit Alive
DonateNow
HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Young MS, Birrell SA, Stanton NA. Appl. Ergon. 2011; 42(4): 533-539.

Affiliation

Ergonomics Research Group, School of Engineering and Design, Brunel University, Uxbridge, Middlesex UB8 3PH, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.apergo.2010.08.012

PMID

20863480

Abstract

Road transport is a significant source of both safety and environmental concerns. With climate change and fuel prices increasingly prominent on social and political agendas, many drivers are turning their thoughts to fuel efficient or 'green' (i.e., environmentally friendly) driving practices. Many vehicle manufacturers are satisfying this demand by offering green driving feedback or advice tools. However, there is a legitimate concern regarding the effects of such devices on road safety - both from the point of view of change in driving styles, as well as potential distraction caused by the in-vehicle feedback. In this paper, we appraise the benchmarks for safe and green driving, concluding that whilst they largely overlap, there are some specific circumstances in which the goals are in conflict. We go on to review current and emerging in-vehicle information systems which purport to affect safe and/or green driving, and discuss some fundamental ergonomics principles for the design of such devices. The results of the review are being used in the Foot-LITE project, aimed at developing a system to encourage 'smart' - that is safe and green - driving.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH



All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print