SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Jamson SL, Tate FN, Jamson AH. Ergonomics 2005; 48(15): 1734-1748.

Affiliation

MWH New Zealand, 123 Taranaki St, PO Box 9624, Wellington, New Zealand. S.L.Jamson@its.leeds.ac.uk

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/00140130500142191

PMID

16373314

Abstract

Variable message signs (VMS) can provide immediate and relevant information to road users and bilingual VMS can provide great flexibility in countries where a significant proportion of the population speak an alternative language to the majority. The study reported here evaluates the effect of various bilingual VMS configurations on driver behaviour and safety. The aim of the study was to determine whether or not the visual distraction associated with bilingual VMS signs of different configurations (length, complexity) impacted on driving performance. A driving simulator was used to allow full control over the scenarios, road environment and sign configuration and both longitudinal and lateral driver performance was assessed. Drivers were able to read one- and two-line monolingual signs and two-line bilingual signs without disruption to their driving behaviour. However, drivers significantly reduced their speed in order to read four-line monolingual and four-line bilingual signs, accompanied by an increase in headway to the vehicle in front. This implies that drivers are possibly reading the irrelevant text on the bilingual sign and various methods for reducing this effect are discussed.


Keywords: Driver distraction

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print