Citation

Cloete SR, Wallis G. Exp. Brain Res. 2009; 195(3): 481-487.

Affiliation

School of Human Movement Studies, University of Queensland, St Lucia, QLD, Australia. scloete@hms.uq.edu.au

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s00221-009-1813-6

PMID

19404622

Abstract

When attempting to perform bi-phasic steering movements (such as a lane change) in the absence of visual and inertial feedback, drivers produce a systematic heading error in the direction of the lane change (Wallis et al., Curr Biol 12(4):295-299, 2002; J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform 33(55):1127-1144, 2007). Theories of steering control which employ exclusively open-loop control mechanisms cannot accommodate this finding. In this article we show that a similar steering error occurs with obstacle avoidance, and offer compelling evidence that it stems from a seemingly general failure of human operators to correctly internalise the dynamics of the steering wheel. With respect to lateral position, the steering wheel is an acceleration control device, but we present data indicating that drivers treat it as a rate control device. Previous findings from Wallis et al. can be explained the same way. Since an open-loop control mechanism will never succeed when the dynamics of the controller are internalised improperly, we go on to conclude that regular, appropriately timed sensory feedback-predominantly from vision-is necessary for regulating heading, even during well-practiced, everyday manoeuvres such as lane changing and obstacle avoidance.

Language: en