SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Baldwin CL, May JF. Transp. Res. F Traffic Psychol. Behav. 2011; 14(1): 36-42.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.trf.2010.09.004

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This study examined the impact of semantic and acoustics parameters of in-vehicle collision warning system (CWS) alarms on driver response. Thirty participants drove a simulated vehicle through scenarios containing five different unexpected hazard events. As drivers approached the hazard event one of four CWS alarms, counter balanced with the hazard event type, or no alarm (control) was presented. Alarms consisted of the signal word "Notice" or "Danger" presented at either 70 or 85 dBA. Rear-end collision events resulted in the highest crash rate, accounting for 45.4% of all crashes. In these scenarios, CWSs significantly reduced crash rates. CWS alarms with an intermediate urgency level achieved through an interaction of semantics and acoustics ("Danger" at 70 dB and "Notice" at 85 dB) resulted in significant reductions in crash probability. Providing an extremely urgent signal word, "Danger" at a high acoustically urgent presentation level - 85 dB was not effective in reducing crashes, nor was a low urgency signal word, "Notice" presented at a low acoustical urgency level - 70 dB. Implications of these results for the design and implementation of CWS systems and auditory alarms in general, are discussed.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print