SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Boll S, Berti S. Psychophysiology 2009; 46(3): 645-654.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2009, Society for Psychophysiological Research, Publisher John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00803.x

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Distractibility with auditory, visual, and bimodal stimulus changes was investigated using an audio‐visual distraction paradigm. Participants were asked to discriminate between equiprobable short and long audio‐visual stimuli. Infrequently, the auditory, the visual, or both parts of the stimuli changed. These rare deviations (deviants) were irrelevant for the actual task. The influence of the three types of deviant stimuli on the processing of task‐relevant information was assessed with behavioral and event‐related potential (ERP) measures assuming that bimodal deviants would lead to an increase in distraction. Behavioral and ERP results did not support this assumption, as reaction time (RT) prolongation and components amplitudes did not differ significantly for auditory and bimodal deviants. It is suggested that a maximal threshold of distraction accounts for these results. In addition, the processing of bimodal deviations was assessed. Audio‐visual interactions were found following modality‐specific deviance detection suggesting that integration only occurs with involuntary attention switching to task‐irrelevant changes.


Keywords: Driver distraction;

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print