SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Martens MH. Hum. Factors 2004; 46(3): 410-423.

Affiliation

TNO Human Factors, Soesterberg, Netherlands. martens@tm.tno.nl

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

15573542

Abstract

Two experiments investigated effects of expectations on eye fixations and responses to expected and unexpected information in a laboratory setting. Stimulus fixation and manual responses to predefined targets among distractors were measured in a dynamic environment shown on a monitor. Participants were part of either a predictable condition (predictable sequence of targets and distractors) or a random condition. In the predictable condition, participants fixated expected distractors less than targets, with similar fixation times in the random condition. Responses to targets were faster in the predictable condition than in the random condition. Irregularities were either missed or responses were slow. This indicates that incorrect expectations may have negative consequences, with practical implications for skill-based tasks such as operator monitoring and driving. Actual or potential applications of this research include introducing operator support for tasks in which the risk of missing unexpected information or of slow responses may be dramatic.


Keywords: Driver distraction;


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print