Citation

Cnossen F, Meijman T, Rothengatter JAT. Ergonomics 2004; 47(2): 218-236.

Affiliation

Artificial Intelligence, University of Groningen, The Netherlands. f.cnossen@ppsw.rug.nl

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/00140130310001629757

PMID

14660214

Abstract

When drivers perform additional tasks while driving, research shows conflicting results: primary driving performance may deteriorate but adaptive changes such as reducing driving speed have also been noted. We hypothesized that the nature of the secondary task may be important: drivers may give more priority to tasks that serve goals of the driving task itself, for example route finding, than tasks not directly relevant for driving, for example tuning the radio. The main objective of the present driving simulator study was to test this hypothesis. Twenty subjects performed two different subsidiary tasks while driving through two levels of traffic density: a working memory (WM) task and a map reading (MAP) task. It was hypothesized that in high task demand situations, the WM task, irrelevant for the driving task, would be neglected more than the MAP task. The results confirmed the hypothesis: in MAP conditions, the WM task was indeed neglected, but map reading resulted in more swerving, indicating that the subjects looked at the map despite the high task demands. It is concluded that drivers will be highly motivated to get route information, and RG systems should therefore present their information in a readily understandable format.


Keywords: Driver distraction;

Language: en