SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Janssen CP, Brumby DP. Cogn. Sci. 2010; 34(8): 1548-1560.

Affiliation

UCL Interaction Centre, University College London.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, John Wiley and Sons)

DOI

10.1111/j.1551-6709.2010.01124.x

PMID

21564260

Abstract

How do people interleave attention when multitasking? One dominant account is that the completion of a subtask serves as a cue to switch tasks. But what happens if switching solely at subtask boundaries led to poor performance? We report a study in which participants manually dialed a UK-style telephone number while driving a simulated vehicle. If the driver were to exclusively return his or her attention to driving after completing a subtask (i.e., using the single break in the xxxxx-xxxxxx representational structure of the number), then we would expect to see a relatively poor driving performance. In contrast, our results show that drivers choose to return attention to steering control before the natural subtask boundary. A computational modeling analysis shows that drivers had to adopt this strategy to meet the required performance objective of maintaining an acceptable lateral position in the road while dialing. Taken together these results support the idea that people can strategically control the allocation of attention in multitask settings to meet specific performance criteria.


Keywords: Driver distraction;


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print