SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Tabrett DR, Latham K. Invest. Ophthalmol. Vis. Sci. 2011; 52(8): 5293-5302.

Affiliation

Anglia Ruskin University, Cambridge, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2011, Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology)

DOI

10.1167/iovs.10-7055

PMID

21613370

Abstract

Purpose. The use of patient reported outcome (PRO) measures to assess self-reported difficulty in visual activities is common in patients with impaired vision. This study determines the visual and psychosocial factors influencing patients' responses to self-report measures, in order to understand what is being measured. Methods. One hundred visually impaired participants completed the Activity Inventory (AI), which assesses self-reported vision-related activity limitation (VRAL) in the task domains of reading, mobility, visual information and visual motor tasks. Participants also completed clinical tests of visual function (distance visual acuity and near reading performance both with and without low vision aids (LVAs), contrast sensitivity, visual fields and depth discrimination), and questionnaires assessing depressive symptoms, social support, adjustment to visual loss and personality. Results. Multiple regression analyses identified that an acuity measure (distance or near), and to a lesser extent near reading performance without LVAs, visual fields and contrast sensitivity best explained self-reported VRAL (28-50% variance explained). Significant psychosocial correlates were depression and adjustment, explaining an additional 6-19% unique variance. Dependent on task domain, the parameters assessed explained 59-71% of the variance in self-reported VRAL. Conclusions. Visual function, most notably acuity without LVAs, is the best predictor of self-reported VRAL assessed by the AI. Depression and adjustment to visual loss also significantly influence self-reported VRAL, largely independent of the severity of visual loss, and most notably in less vision specific tasks. The results suggest that rehabilitation strategies addressing depression and adjustment could improve perceived visual disability.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print