Citation

Horberry TJ, Halliday M, Gale AG. Accid. Anal. Prev. 2002; 34(5): 581-588.

Affiliation

Key Centre for Human Factors, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia. t.horberry@humanfactors.uq.edu.au

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

12214952

Abstract

Cases of high-sided vehicles striking low bridges is a large problem in many countries, especially the UK. This paper describes an experiment to evaluate a new design of markings for low bridges. A full size bridge was constructed which was capable of having its overhead clearance adjusted. Subjects sat in a truck cab as it drove towards the bridge and were asked to judge whether the vehicle could pass safely under the bridge. The main objective of the research was to determine whether marking the bridge with a newly devised experimental marking would result in more cautious decisions from subjects regarding whether or not the experimental bridge structure could be passed under safely compared with the currently used UK bridge marking standard. The results show that the type of bridge marking influenced the level of caution associated with decisions regarding bridge navigation, with the new marking design producing the most cautious decisions for the two different bridge heights used, at all distances away from the bridge structure. Additionally, the distance before the bridge at which decisions were given had an effect on the level of caution associated with decisions regarding bridge navigation (the closer to the bridge, the more cautious the decisions became, irrespective of the marking design). The implications of these results for reducing the number of bridge strikes are discussed.