SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Soni A, Chawla A, Mukherjee S, Malhotra R. Int. J. Crashworthiness 2010; 15(5): 543-551.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2010, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/13588265.2010.491713

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of muscle contraction on lower extremity injuries for pedestrian walking posture in a car–pedestrian lateral impact at low speed. The full body model, pedestrian model with active lower extremities (PMALE), which was configured in a symmetric standing posture, has been repositioned in the walking posture. Finite-element simulations have then been performed using the PMALE in walking posture and front structures of a car. Two impact configurations, i.e. impact on the right and left legs, have been simulated. Two pre-impact conditions, that of a symmetrically standing pedestrian representing a cadaver and an unaware pedestrian, have been simulated for both the impact configurations. Stretch-based reflexive action was included in the simulations for an unaware pedestrian. It is concluded that (1) with muscle contraction, the risk of ligament failure decreases whereas the risk of bone fracture increases; (2) in lateral impacts, Medial Collateral Ligament (MCL) could be considered as the most vulnerable and Lateral Collateral Ligament (LCL) as the safest ligament; and (3) for a walking pedestrian, Posterior Cruciate Ligament (PCL) would be at a higher risk in the case of impact on the rear leg, whereas Anterior Cruciate Ligament (ACL) would be at a higher risk if car strikes the front leg.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print