SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Ayres T, Li L, Trachtman D, Young D. Int. J. Ind. Ergonomics 2005; 35(2): 157-162.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2005, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.ergon.2004.05.009

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Passenger-side rear-view mirrors (PRMs) have been standard equipment on motor vehicles sold in the US for many years, although they are not required by the federal motor vehicle safety standards. Numerous studies documented both the apparent need for PRMs (to overcome visual obstructions) and their apparent value (by increasing visual access to the passenger-side rear). In addition, surveys of drivers have found a general appreciation of the importance of sampling visual information from the rear. Very little can be found, however, regarding the actual safety benefit of PRMs. A review of the research literature and several initial studies (driver observation and accident-data analysis), suggest that PRMs may not be associated with any substantial accident prevention, perhaps because they are not consistently used. Implications and research directions will be discussed.
Relevance to Industry
PRMs should have been a success story, having been carefully developed through research to provide important information for safe driving. The apparent failure of PRMs to reduce accident rates in practice illustrates a potential problem with designing and deploying safety features or devices without empirical assessment of normal user behavior.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print