CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Merritt AC, Monin B. Emot. Rev. 2011; 3(3): 318-319. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2011, International Society for Research on Emotion, Publisher SAGE Publishing) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
unavailable |
|
Abstract |
If lay theories associate moral intuitions with deeply held values, people should feel uncomfortable relying on deliberative thinking when judging violations of personal taboos. In two preliminary studies, participants with siblings of the opposite sex were particularly troubled when evaluating a sibling incest scenario under instructions to think slowly and rationally, or when the scenario was presented in a hard-to-read font forcing them to employ deliberative processing. This suggests that we may be intuitive intuitionists, and opens the door for investigations of people's preferred modes of moral judgment. |