CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Lebel J, Nunno MA, Mohr WK, O'Halloran R. Am. J. Orthopsychiatry 2012; 82(1): 75-86. |
|
Affiliation |
Commonwealth of Massachusetts Department of Mental Health Cornell University University of Medicine and Dentistry, New Jersey Office of the Medical Examiner, Ventura County, California. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2012, American Orthopsychiatric Association, Publisher Wiley Blackwell) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
22239396 |
|
Abstract |
Restraint and seclusion (R&S) are high risk, emergency procedures that are used in response to perceived violent, dangerous situations. They have been employed for years in a variety of settings that serve children, such as psychiatric hospitals and residential treatment facilities, but are now being recognized as used in the public schools. The field of education has begun to examine these practices in response to national scrutiny and a Congressional investigation. The fields of mental health and child welfare were similarly scrutinized 10 years ago following national media attention and have advanced R&S practice through the adoption of a prevention framework and core strategies to prevent and reduce use. A review of the evolution of the national R&S movement, the adverse effects of these procedures, and a comprehensive approach to prevent their use with specific core strategies such as leadership, workforce development, and youth and family involvement in order to facilitate organizational culture and practice change are discussed. Proposed guidelines for R&S use in schools and systemic recommendations to promote R&S practice alignment between the child-serving service sectors are also offered. Language: en |