SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Stevens JC, Cain WS, Weinstein DE, Pierce JB. Fire Technol. 1987; 23(3): 198-204.

Affiliation

Foundation Laboratory, Yale University, USA

Copyright

(Copyright © 1987, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/BF01036936

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Weakened smelling is common in age. Two studies here show that this phenomenon frequently reveals itself in inability to detect ethyl mercaptan, the warning agent most commonly added to propane (LP-gas). The first study compared 21 young (18-25 years) with 21 old (70-85 years) persons for (a) detection threshold (average ten times higher in the elderly), (b) suprathreshold odor strength (weaker for the elderly at all levels), and (c) ability to identify common odors (the elderly did worse). Seven of the 21 elderly failed to detect ethyl mercaptan at or above a concentration associated with the boundary between acceptable and unacceptable levels of propane. Three of these failed to detect the odorant at a concentration where accompanying propane could explode. In the second study 50 of 110 persons over 60 years failed to detect odor reliably in commercial odorized propane diluted to the Department of Transportation's safety standard (one-fifth the lower explosive limit). Six of 52 persons under 40 also failed. The elderly person would seem at high risk of LP-gas fire.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print