SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Hamlall V, Morrell R. Gend. Educ. 2012; 24(5): 483-498.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/09540253.2012.677012

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Boys are commonly associated with disruptive behaviour and physical fighting at school. Explanations for this behaviour range from naturalistic 'boys will be boys' approaches to analyses which focus on the social construction of masculinity and emphasise the gendered nature of boys' behaviour. Whichever view holds sway, it is often assumed that conflict and disagreement lead, in automatic, linear and unproblematic ways, to instances of physical violence. In fact, the situation is more complicated and less predictable. Provocations (taunts, insults and jostling) may escalate conflict and give rise to fights but this will depend on the form, the social and physical setting, the school's gender regime and, critically, the investment of individual boys in particular constructions of masculinity. In this article, we explore how boys in a coeducational secondary school in Durban, South Africa, verbally provoke one another and how these provocations on some, but not all, occasions result in physical violence.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print