Citation

Donovan RJ, Jalleh G, Henley N. Accid. Anal. Prev. 1999; 31(3): 243-252.

Affiliation

Graduate School of Management, University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Australia. rdonovan@mailhost.ecel.uwa.edu.au

Copyright

(Copyright © 1999, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

10196601

Abstract

Twelve (12) road safety television commercials (TVCs) ranging in production costs from $A15,000 to $A250,000 (current prices) were evaluated using standard advertising pre-test procedures. The twelve ads covered four road safety behaviours (speeding; drink driving; fatigue; and inattention), and included a variety of executional types within and across behaviours. One ad in each of the four behaviours was an expensive TAC and ($A200,000 or more). The testing procedure assessed respondents' self-reported impact of the ad on their future intentions to comply with the road safety behavior advocated in the ad. Just under 1000 appropriately screened motor vehicle drivers license holders were recruited via street intercept methods and randomly allocated to one of the twelve and exposure conditions. The results showed that while the two best performing ads were highly dramatic TAC ads showing graphic crash scenes, these were also the most expensive ads to produce, and, being 60 and 90 s, the most expensive to air. In several cases, 30 s low cost talking heads testimonials performed equally as well as their far more expensive counterparts. We conclude that big production budgets may not be necessary to create effective road safety advertising.


Keywords: Driver distraction;