Citation

Hofmann P, Rinkenauer G. Ergonomics 2013; 56(2): 268-281.

Affiliation

a Modern Human-Machine Systems , IfADo - Leibniz Research Centre for Working Environment and Human Factors , Dortmund , Germany.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, Informa - Taylor and Francis Group)

DOI

10.1080/00140139.2012.760752

PMID

23419087

Abstract

Anticipation of future events is crucial for driving performance and safety. The aim of this study is to assess the relevance of theoretical frameworks of response preparation (response priming, movement integration theory) for driving. In a customised lane change task, valid and invalid primes were used to indicate the direction of the forthcoming lane changes. Reaction time (RT) and phase durations from steering movements served as dependent measures. In agreement with the theoretical considerations, we found a clear effect of validity on RT and steering kinematics. RTs were faster and the duration of the initial steering phase was shorter with valid than with invalid advance information. The experimental outcomes suggest that the theoretical considerations about benefits and costs of response preparation can be generalised to driving manoeuvres. Therefore, response priming paradigms might be well suited to investigate preparatory effects of advance information, e.g. in the context of advanced driving assistance systems. Practitioner summary: Benefits and costs of response preparation were assessed in the context of driving. The findings suggest that the understanding of preparatory processes is of relevance to enhance driving performance and safety. It is possible to derive some implications that may be useful for the design of assistance and information systems.

Language: en