CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Ebrahim S, Busse JW, Guyatt GH, Birch S. J. Public Health Policy 2013; 34(2): 320-329. |
|
Affiliation |
Department of Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, McMaster University, HHC 2C, 1280 Main Street West, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2013, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group -- Palgrave-Macmillan) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
23639998 |
|
Abstract |
Motor vehicle accident (MVA) insurance in Canada is based primarily on two different compensation systems: (i) no-fault, in which policyholders are unable to seek recovery for losses caused by other parties (unless they have specified dollar or verbal thresholds) and (ii) tort, in which policyholders may seek general damages. As insurance companies pay for MVA-related health care costs, excess use of health care services may occur as a result of consumers' (accident victims) and/or producers' (health care providers) behavior - often referred to as the moral hazard of insurance. In the United States, moral hazard is greater for low dollar threshold no-fault insurance compared with tort systems. In Canada, high dollar threshold or pure no-fault versus tort systems are associated with faster patient recovery and reduced MVA claims. These findings suggest that high threshold no-fault or pure no-fault compensation systems may be associated with improved outcomes for patients and reduced moral hazard. Language: en |