SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Grosse J, Weber R, van de Par S. J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 2013; 133(5): 3598.

Affiliation

Acoust. Group, Univ. of Oldenburg, Carl-von-Ossietzky-strasse 9-11, Oldenburg 26129, Germanysteven.van.de.par@uni-oldenburg.de.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2013, American Institute of Physics)

DOI

10.1121/1.4806658

PMID

23655989

Abstract

This study investigates the difference in audibility of an approaching conventional car with internal combustion engine and an electric car at various velocities. The goal was to compare the risk that pedestrians do not hear the approaching car in time. Binaural recordings of each of these approaching cars were presented together with either a traffic noise masker or a pink noise masker. In the first detection experiment, the threshold level was determined for which the cars could just be detected. In a second reaction time experiment, the moment was determined at which the approaching car was first detectable. This measured reaction time should give an indication about how much time a person has to evade an impending collision. Results indicated that slowly approaching electric cars where less audible than cars with a conventional engine. The results also showed that the decrement of reaction times as a function of SNR was halved when pink noise was used instead of traffic noise. A psycho-acoustic masking model [Dau et al., J. Acoust. Soc. Am. 99, 3615-3622 (1996)] was applied to predict detection thresholds and showed good correspondence with the subjective data.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print