SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Itoh M. Cogn. Technol. Work 2012; 14(1): 51-60.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2012, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s10111-011-0195-2

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

Avoiding human overtrust in machines is a vital issue to establish a socially acceptable advanced driver assistance system (ADAS). However, research has not clarified the effective way of designing an ADAS to prevent driver overtrust in the system. It is necessary to develop a theoretical framework that is useful to understand how a human trust becomes excessive. This paper proposes a trust model by which overtrust can be clearly defined. It is shown that at least three types of overtrust are distinguished on the basis of the model. As an example, this paper discusses human overtrust in an adaptive cruise control (ACC) system. By conducting an experiment on a medium-fidelity driving simulator, we observed two types of overtrust among the three. The first one is that some drivers relied on the ACC system beyond its limit of decelerating capability. The second one is that a driver relied on the ACC systems by expecting that it could decelerate against a stopped vehicle. It is estimated through data analysis how those kinds of overtrust emerged. Furthermore, the possible ways for prevention of human overtrust in ADAS are discussed.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print