SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Nuthmann A. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2014; 40(1): 342-360.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2014, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/a0033854

PMID

23937216

Abstract

An important factor constraining visual search performance is the inhomogeneity of the visual system. Engaging participants in a scene search task, the present study explored how the different regions of the visual field contribute to search. Gaze-contingent Blindspots and Spotlights were implemented to determine the absolute and relative importance of the different visual regions for object-in-scene search. Three Blindspot/Spotlight radii (1.6°, 2.9°, and 4.1°) were used to differentiate between foveal, parafoveal, and peripheral vision. When searching the scene with artificially impaired foveal or central vision (Blindspots), search performance was surprisingly unimpaired. Foveal vision was not necessary to attain normal search performance. When high-resolution scene information was withheld in both foveal and parafoveal vision (4.1° Blindspot), target localization was unimpaired but it took longer to verify the identity of the target. Artificially impairing extrafoveal scene analysis (Spotlights) affected attentional selection and visual processing; shrinking the Spotlight of high resolution led to longer search times, shorter saccades, and more and longer fixations. The 4.1° radius was identified as the crossover point of equal search times in Blindspot and Spotlight conditions. However, a gaze-data based decomposition of search times into behaviorally defined epochs revealed differences in particular subprocesses of search. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2013 APA, all rights reserved).


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print