SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Chong J, Triggs TJ. Hum. Factors 1989; 31(1): 63-75.

Copyright

(Copyright © 1989, Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, Publisher SAGE Publishing)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

2707819

Abstract

The visual environment of a driver in a car or a pilot in an airplane has intervening objects from the vehicle such as A-pillar posts between the windscreen and the doors in the car or cockpit pillars in the airplane. The presence of such objects can bias the observer's visual accommodation response because of the Mandelbaum effect (e.g., Owens, 1979). When subjects were allowed to focus toward a distance by looking through a large aperture in an intervening post, the detection (monocular) of a briefly presented distant target was found to be significantly better than when no aperture was present. When the size of the aperture was decreased from 2.3 to 1.15 deg diameter, target detection performance was significantly decreased and remained constant as further reduction of foveal cues was made. Although the detection results were generally in agreement with the visual accommodation results, detection accuracy changed significantly only with marked changes in accommodation. In addition to an accommodation bias, interference to target detection was also observed for those targets occurring at a laterally proximal position to the intervening object.

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print