Citation

Hanley JE, Orbell J, Morikawa T. Polit. Life Sci. 2002; 21(1): 13-18.

Affiliation

Workshop in Political Theory and Policy Analysis, Indiana University, Bloomington, IN 47408. james@jhanley.net.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2002, Association for Politics and the Life Sciences)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

16859339

Abstract

The hijacking and purposeful crashing of airplanes into the World Trade Center and the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, prompts questions about why the passengers and crew of those airplanes did not act to prevent these attacks, as did at least some passengers on a hijacked flight that crashed in Pennsylvania. We argue, first, that humans have an evolved cognitive bias that leads to the expectation that antagonists hope to survive conflict and, second, that highly credible information to the contrary is needed to overcome this bias. Absent such information, the passengers on at least two airplanes incorrectly interpreted the game being played as a hawk-dove version of a conflict-of-interest game, when it was actually a "suicidal terrorism" variant of that family. Given that other terrorists may have been in the air and ready to act, the airlines' policy of not informing passengers about such events could have risked disabling them from reacting forcefully when force alone was advisable.

Language: en