CONTACT US: Contact info
|
Citation |
Klaassen MJ, Peter J. J. Sex Res. 2014; 52(7): 721-735. |
|
Affiliation |
a Amsterdam School of Communication Research , University of Amsterdam. |
|
Copyright |
(Copyright © 2014, Society for the Scientific Study of Sexuality) |
|
DOI |
|
PMID |
25420868 |
|
Abstract |
Although Internet pornography is widely consumed and researchers have started to investigate its effects, we still know little about its content. This has resulted in contrasting claims about whether Internet pornography depicts gender (in)equality and whether this depiction differs between amateur and professional pornography. We conducted a content analysis of three main dimensions of gender (in)equality (i.e., objectification, power, and violence) in 400 popular pornographic Internet videos from the most visited pornographic Web sites. Objectification was depicted more often for women through instrumentality, but men were more frequently objectified through dehumanization. Regarding power, men and women did not differ in social or professional status, but men were more often shown as dominant and women as submissive during sexual activities. Except for spanking and gagging, violence occurred rather infrequently. Nonconsensual sex was also relatively rare. Overall, amateur pornography contained more gender inequality at the expense of women than professional pornography did. Language: en |