SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Schneider DW. J. Exp. Psychol. Hum. Percept. Perform. 2015; 41(5): 1315-1324.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, American Psychological Association)

DOI

10.1037/xhp0000091

PMID

26076177

Abstract

Modulation of cognitive control was investigated by using a proportion congruent manipulation to change response congruency effects in task switching. In an experiment that involved cued switching between semantic categorization tasks, targets were either congruent or incongruent (mapped to the same or different responses across tasks, respectively), and the proportion of congruent targets was manipulated between subjects. Response congruency effects (worse performance for incongruent than for congruent targets) were observed, and they increased with proportion congruent for both response time and error rate. A sequential congruency effect (a smaller response congruency effect following an incongruent than a congruent trial) was observed for error rate, but only for task repetitions. The results suggested top-down control of attention rather than bottom-up control based on item-specific learning, because targets were never repeated during the experiment. Implications for understanding attentional control of response selection in conflict situations are discussed. (PsycINFO Database Record


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print