SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Leonetti A, Puglisi G, Siugzdaite R, Ferrari C, Cerri G, Borroni P. Exp. Brain Res. 2015; 233(10): 3013-3022.

Affiliation

Department of Health Sciences, Medical School, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via A. di Rudinì 8, 20142, Milan, Italy, antonella.leonetti@unimi.it.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, Holtzbrinck Springer Nature Publishing Group)

DOI

10.1007/s00221-015-4371-0

PMID

26169105

Abstract

Observation of others' actions evokes a subliminal motor resonant response, which reflects the motor program encoding observed actions. The possibility that actions located in the peripheral field of vision may also activate motor resonant responses has not been investigated. We examine the excitability modulation of motor pathways in response to grasping actions viewed in near peripheral vision; results are directly compared to responses to the same actions viewed in central vision (Borroni et al. in Eur J Neurosci 34:662-669, 2011. doi: 10.1111/j.1460-9568.2011.07779.x ). We hypothesize that actions observed in peripheral vision are effective in modulating the excitability of motor pathways, but that responses have a low kinematic specificity. While the neural resources of central vision provide the most accurate perception of biological motion, the decreased visual acuity in periphery may be sufficient to discriminate only general aspects of movement and perhaps to recognize the gist of visual scenes. Right-handed subjects observed a video of two grasping actions at 10° eccentricity in the horizontal plane. Motor-evoked potentials were elicited in the right OP and ADM muscles by TMS of the left primary motor cortex at different delays during the observed actions.

RESULTS show that actions viewed in near peripheral vision are effective in modulating the subliminal activation of motor circuits, but that responses are rough and inaccurate, and do not reflect the motor program encoding the observed action or its goal. We suggest that due to their limited kinematic accuracy, these subliminal motor responses may provide information about the general aspects of observed actions, rather than their specific execution.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print