SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Schlenstedt C, Brombacher S, Hartwigsen G, Weisser B, Möller B, Deuschl G. Phys. Ther. 2015; 96(4): 494-501.

Affiliation

G. Deuschl, MD, PhD, Department of Neurology, Christian-Albrechts University, University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein, Campus Kiel, Schittenhelmstr 10, 24105 Kiel, Germany.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2015, American Physical Therapy Association)

DOI

10.2522/ptj.20150249

PMID

26381806

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The correct identification of patients with Parkinson's disease (PD) at risk of falling is important to early initiate appropriate treatment.

OBJECTIVE: This study compares the Fullerton Advanced Balance (FAB) scale with the Mini Balance Evaluation Systems Test (Mini-BESTest) and Berg Balance Scale (BBS) to identify individuals with PD at risk for falls and to analyze which of the items of the scales best predict future falls.

DESIGN: Prospective study to assess predictive criterion-related validity. SETTING: University hospital in an urban community. PATIENTS: 85 patients with idiopathic PD (Hoehn & Yahr stage: 1-4). MEASUREMENTS: Number of falls (assessed prospectively over 6 months), FAB scale, Mini-BESTest, BBS and Unified Parkinson's Disease Rating Scale.

RESULTS: The FAB scale, Mini-BESTest and BBS had an accuracy to predict future falls of 0.68, 0.65 and 0.69 of the area under the curve (AUC) of the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, respectively. A model combining the items "tandem stance", "rise to toes", "one leg stance", "compensatory stepping backward", "turning" and "placing alternate foot on stool" had an AUC of 0.84 of the ROC curve. LIMITATIONS: Drop-out rate of 19 subjects.

CONCLUSIONS: The FAB scale, Mini-BESTest and BBS provide moderate capacity to predict fallers with one or more falls from non-fallers. Only some items of the three scales contribute to the detection of future falls. Clinicians should particularly focus on the items "tandem stance" in addition with the items "one leg stance", "rise to toes", "compensatory stepping backward", "turning 360°" and "placing foot on stool" when analyzing postural control deficits related to fall risk. Future research should analyze if balance training including the aforementioned items is effective to reduce fall risk.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print