Citation

Meffert H, Hwang S, Nolan ZT, Chen G, Blair JR. Data Brief 2016; 7: 66-70.

Affiliation

National Institutes of Health, United States.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2016, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.dib.2016.02.011

PMID

26955650

PMCID

PMC4761693

Abstract

The neural circuitry underlying response control is often studied using go/no-go tasks, in which participants are required to respond as fast as possible to go cues and withhold from responding to no-go stimuli. In the current task, response control was studied using a fully counterbalanced design in which blocks with a low frequency of no-go cues (75% go, 25% no-go) were alternated with blocks with a low frequency of go cues (25% go, 75% no-go); see also "Segregating attention from response control when performing a motor inhibition task: Segregating attention from response control" [1]. We applied a whole brain corrected, paired t-test to the data assessing for regions differentially activated by low frequency no-go cues relative to high frequency go cues. In addition, we conducted a generalized psychophysiological interaction analysis on the data using a right inferior frontal gyrus seed region. This region was identified through the BOLD response t-test and was chosen because right inferior gyrus is highly implicated in response inhibition.

Language: en