Citation

Green P. Int. J. Veh. Des. 1996; 17(1): 27-39.

Affiliation

Univ of Michigan Transportation Research Inst, Ann Arbor, MI, USA

Copyright

(Copyright © 1996, Inderscience Publishers)

DOI

unavailable

PMID

unavailable

Abstract

This paper describes the research conducted as part of the development of a driver interface for warning drivers about low oil pressure, worn tyres, etc. In the first experiment, 27 drivers were asked questions that examined their knowledge of components that might fail (e.g. 'What is an alternator for?'). For about half of the items, their knowledge was inadequate. In a second experiment, 60 drivers selected the words they preferred for nine prototypical warnings from columns of choices (e.g. should the brake fluid warning use the word 'add,' 'low,' 'refill,' or something else). This new method allowed a large set of messages to be rapidly produced from a limited data set. Drivers preferred command messages (what to do) over error messages (what was wrong). In the third experiment, 20 drivers responded to 15 candidate messages. While most messages were well understood, this experiment identified a few problems with specific warnings and the vehicle mimic.