SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Degia A, Meadows R, Johnsen S, Dixon P, Hindmarch I, Boyle J. J. Clin. Forensic Med. 2006; 13(5): 242-246.

Affiliation

HPRU Medical Research Centre, School of Biomedical and Molecular Sciences, University of Surrey, Guildford GU2 7XP, United Kingdom. a.degia@surrey.ac.uk

Copyright

(Copyright © 2006, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.jcfm.2005.11.007

PMID

16442832

Abstract

RATIONALE: Driving performance is easily disrupted as a direct consequence of the use of alcohol, licit and illicit drugs. The use of such drugs has a high degree of correlation with increased accident risk. Europe wide research projects into drugged driving have called for the development of a portable objective device capable of screening those impaired through drug use which can be used at the roadside. OBJECTIVE: This study investigated the cognitive and psychomotor performance of a cohort of polydrug drug users in field conditions. Volunteers completed a psychometric test battery on a hand held device in music festival conditions. The test battery comprised a critical tracking task (CTT) and a sustained attention to response task (SART). Volunteers also took a breathanalyser and provided a saliva sample for a DOA screen. RESULTS: On the CTT significance was observed for tracking error following response to a peripheral stimulus in the high alcohol (>80 mg/100 ml) illicit drug group (p=0.0090) and approached significance for the low alcohol (<80 mg/100 ml) illicit drug group (p=0.088). For the SART, incorrect presses to the target stimulus was impaired for volunteers in both the low (<80 mg/100 ml) alcohol illicit drug group (p=0.0080) and the high alcohol (>80 mg/100 ml) illicit drug group (p=0.0415). Discrimination analysis demonstrated that the impairment device was able to discriminate between those individuals who had consumed neither alcohol nor drugs (94.12%), those in the low alcohol drug group (46.67%) and those in the high alcohol drug group (60.00%). CONCLUSION: It is possible to derive an impairment ratio. Further research will demonstrate whether this device could significantly contribute to drug driving detection and road traffic safety.


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print