SAFETYLIT WEEKLY UPDATE

We compile citations and summaries of about 400 new articles every week.
RSS Feed

HELP: Tutorials | FAQ
CONTACT US: Contact info

Search Results

Journal Article

Citation

Lansdown TC, Burns PC, Parkes AM. Appl. Ergon. 2004; 35(3): 225-232.

Affiliation

Heriot Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, UK.

Copyright

(Copyright © 2004, Elsevier Publishing)

DOI

10.1016/j.apergo.2003.11.013

PMID

15145285

Abstract

This paper discusses the limitations and potential of using an occlusion test to assess visual distraction and the suitability of an in-vehicle information system (IVIS) task for driving. This discussion was expanded from issues raised during a UK workshop on occlusion. The paper describes the research history and empirical foundations of occlusion. It describes some of the occlusion technology and applications for this procedure. Issues concerning the occlusion tasks and the duration and timing of occlusion are presented. The main part of this paper focuses on the priority research considerations for occlusion. The paper concludes with a description of some alternatives to occlusion and future research needs. It is concluded that the occlusion test has some promise, however the empirical basis for occlusion is lacking. If occlusion is to be developed as a metric to determine maximal safe visual distraction, substantial barriers remain.


Keywords: Driver distraction


Language: en

NEW SEARCH


All SafetyLit records are available for automatic download to Zotero & Mendeley
Print